Creatorpedia:Verification Standards
Core Principle Information on cP must be verifiable. Readers must be able to check that the information comes from a reliable source. cP does not publish original research or unverified claims.
Acceptable Sources cP accepts a broader range of sources than traditional encyclopedias, recognizing the unique nature of the creator economy:
- Official creator channels: Verified social media accounts, official websites, press kits
- Established media: News articles, interviews, reputable blogs
- Platform data: Public follower counts, view statistics, verified achievements
- Tabloid and entertainment media: Accepted with caution. Must be clearly attributed. Controversial claims require multiple sources or creator acknowledgment.
- Self-published sources: Accepted for non-controversial biographical details when no better source exists
Source Hierarchy When multiple sources conflict, prefer: 1. Creator's own verified statements 2. Reputable media outlets 3. Corroborated tabloid reporting 4. Fan documentation (with clear attribution)
What Requires a Source
- Net worth estimates
- Relationship status
- Controversies or disputes
- Earnings claims
- Awards and achievements
- Personal background details
- Claims of exotic acquisition
What Does Not Require a Source
- Basic arithmetic
- Obvious public information (e.g., "TikTok is a video platform")
- Content of the article itself (it cites itself)
Challenging Information
Any editor may challenge unsourced or poorly sourced material. Add {{Citation needed}} or discuss on the Thought tab.
Removal Policy Unsourced material may be removed. Material from questionable sources may be retained with proper attribution if it meets notability guidelines.
See also: Creatorpedia:Content Policy